stoopider

a way of life

Posts Tagged ‘Democrats’

More Primary Predictions

Posted by soopergrover on February 8, 2008

Don’t look now kids but this thing ain’t over by a long shot. I am predicting that February is going to be a cold cruel month for Hillary Clinton but, if she can make it through the February gauntlet, things will look up for her in March.

Anyway, the logic these predictions are based on is fairly simple:

  • Obama has been winning caucuses and primaries where the state has a significant black population (i.e. here comes D.C., Baltimore, Louisiana)
  • Clinton has been winning hard core democratic state primaries and still does well with Hispanics
  • McCain is taking pretty much every moderate to conservative republican state
  • Huckabee is winning the states in which a majority of republicans still believe in Santa Claus, the Rapture and Magic Faries (no not Sigfried and Roy, the other kind).

Upcoming Primaries (my projected winner) *

February 9
Louisiana primary (Obama, Huckabee),
Washington caucuses (Obama, McCain),
Nebraska caucuses – democrats only (Obama)
Kansas caucuses – republicans only (Huckabee)

February 10
Maine caucuses – democrats only (Obama)

February 12
Maryland primary (Obama, McCain)
Virginia primary (Obama, McCain)
Washington, D.C. primary (Obama, McCain)

February 19

Wisconsin primary (Obama, McCain)
Hawaii caucuses – democrats only (Obama)

March 4
Ohio primary (Obama, McCain)
Rhode Island primary (Clinton, McCain)
Texas primary (Clinton, Huckabee)
Vermont primary (Clinton)

*As always, predictions guaranteed or your money back

Posted in politics | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Can we?

Posted by soopergrover on February 2, 2008

Posted in politics | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

It’s time to take the red pill Mr. Edwards

Posted by soopergrover on January 16, 2008

Lord knows I am an Edwards fan. His southern boot-straps biography and his ability to give a voice to the seemingly continuous screwing over that a lot of decent people get just because they have to live on the margins are both reasons why he is a great candidate. But, the writing is on the 30-foot wall of flaming letters and it is time for him to go.

Sure, he may end up being viable in Nevada’s caucuses (as goofy and as litigious as they are shaping up to be) but he probably won’t win outright and, even if he does, he won’t win South Carolina, otherwise known as the state next door to his own. And with that, out of money and with the party leadership probably pressuring him to get out, I predict that John Edwards will say good bye.

What will be interesting is where the Edwards voters go and where, if anywhere, he tells them to go. I personally hope that he will enthusiastically endorse Barack Obama. The idea of a white southern politician who grew up in the segregated south endorsing a black man for president has definite appeal and would reflect well on how far we have come as a country.

Although, realistically Edwards will probably hold off on endorsing anyone to ensure himself some political capital with the eventual nominee.

Finally, I doubt that either Hillary or Obama will consider Edwards as a viable V.P. candidate due to him not being able to deliver a single southern state for John Kerry and his less-than-impressive debate performance against Dick Cheney in 2004. However, after 8 years of corrupt and inept leadership at the Justice Department, “Attorney General John Edwards” has a very nice ring to it.

Posted in politics | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Who are ‘they?’

Posted by soopergrover on January 6, 2008

You know, they said this day would never come. They said our sights were set too high. They said this country was too divided, too disillusioned to ever come together around a common purpose. – Barack Obama, Iowa Jan. 3, 2008.

One question, Barack – who are ‘they?’ Sure in your next paragraph you call them ‘the cynics’ but that’s really just what ‘they’ are, not who ‘they’ are. So who are these people, you know the dastardly ones who have been holding us up from enjoying the sweet sweet sunshine and flowery goodness that we really should have been experiencing all along? Clearly a lot of stuff is their fault, I mean, dividing and disillusioning an entire country – these are obviously bad people. So who are ‘they?’

For John Edwards, ‘they’ are all the greedy corporations and the fat cat lobbyists that apparently own every senator and congressman in Washington D.C. (except for him.)

For Hillary, well she doesn’t say so but I’m pretty sure she’d tell you that ‘they’ is whomever the hell you, dear voter, want them to be as long as it gets her enough votes to beat the crap out of John and Barack come Tuesday, Feb. 5th. (Is it just me or is she the blonde Henry Kissinger?)

Well, I think I know who ‘they’ is and I think I have some bad news because ‘they’ are not OPEC. ‘They’ are not Osama Bin Laden or Ayman al-Zawahri (although the sooner we stake both their wretched heads on pikes at the entrance to New York harbor the better off we’ll all be).

And, sorry Mitt and Huck but ‘they’ are also definitely not a bunch of Mexican busboys working twice as hard as everyone else in this country just so that they can buy food for their kids. I am also pretty sure that they are most certainly not two people who love each other and just want to be left alone to get married.

‘They’ are us. That’s right – us. We are the ones who are gleefully celebrating our 401K s going up up up because they are fat with investments in John’s greedy corporations. These would be the same corporations that need to keep their stock price up so that we will invest in them and they won’t have to layoff their employees (you know, employees like us).

We are the ones driving the cars that sent oil to $100 a barrel yesterday. And we are the ones who let people like Dick Cheney stick around just because he’s really good at scaring the crap out of 50% of the country. Ok, he actually scares the crap out of the other 50% but for different reasons.

And while we are at it, we are also the ones who are getting fatter and older and demanding that medical science prioritize our erections and our self-inflicted diabetes over the easy cheap stuff like pre-natal care for poor women.

So John, Barack and Hillary (ok, maybe not you Hillary, you are just too far gone) why don’t you guys stop pandering to us and start telling us that the country is in a mess, it’s going to get worse and that the only way to fix it is for all of us to start making sacrifices and to stop letting our fears make our choices for us. This may not be your best strategy for winning the presidency but, if you want your campaign and your presidency to mean anything, then trying to stop the country from getting fatter, lazier and stoopider would be an amazing legacy.

John, Mitt, Mike and Rudy well, you guys need to just stop hating people because of who they sleep with or where they were born. Let’s just start there.

As the turnout numbers from Iowa showed last night, this might be the first election that the AARP, the NRA, the UAW or the Southern Baptist Convention (pick your favorite villain, odds are that you or someone you know gives them money – it’s us that we are talking about after all) can’t just go ahead and rig the election at the expense of the rest of the country. It would be a shame if who ever wins does it by dividing, demonizing and coddling a select few while the folks who weren’t on the winning side got to look forward to 4 more years of picking up the tab.

Posted in politics | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »